for

for (initialization; condition; afterthought)
  statement

initialization Optional

An expression (including assignment expressions) or variable declaration evaluated once before the loop begins. Typically used to initialize a counter variable. This expression may optionally declare new variables with var or let keywords. Variables declared with var are not local to the loop, i.e. they are in the same scope the for loop is in. Variables declared with let are local to the statement.

The result of this expression is discarded.

condition Optional

An expression to be evaluated before each loop iteration. If this expression evaluates to true, statement is executed. If the expression evaluates to false, execution exits the loop and goes to the first statement after the for construct.

This conditional test is optional. If omitted, the condition always evaluates to true.

afterthought Optional

An expression to be evaluated at the end of each loop iteration. This occurs before the next evaluation of condition. Generally used to update or increment the counter variable.

statement

A statement that is executed as long as the condition evaluates to true. You can use a block statement to execute multiple statements. To execute no statement within the loop, use an empty statement (;).

The following for statement starts by declaring the variable i and initializing it to 0. It checks that i is less than nine, performs the two succeeding statements, and increments i by 1 after each pass through the loop.

for (let i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
  console.log(i);
  // more statements
}

The initialization block accepts both expressions and variable declarations. However, expressions cannot use the in operator unparenthesized, because that is ambiguous with a for...in loop.

for (let i = "start" in window ? window.start : 0; i < 9; i++) {
  console.log(i);
}
// SyntaxError: 'for-in' loop variable declaration may not have an initializer.

// Parenthesize the whole initializer
for (let i = ("start" in window ? window.start : 0); i < 9; i++) {
  console.log(i);
}

// Parenthesize the `in` expression
for (let i = ("start" in window) ? window.start : 0; i < 9; i++) {
  console.log(i);
}

All three expressions in the head of the for loop are optional. For example, it is not required to use the initialization block to initialize variables:

let i = 0;
for (; i < 9; i++) {
  console.log(i);
  // more statements
}

Like the initialization block, the condition part is also optional. If you are omitting this expression, you must make sure to break the loop in the body in order to not create an infinite loop.

for (let i = 0; ; i++) {
  console.log(i);
  if (i > 3) break;
  // more statements
}

You can also omit all three expressions. Again, make sure to use a break statement to end the loop and also modify (increase) a variable, so that the condition for the break statement is true at some point.

let i = 0;

for (;;) {
  if (i > 3) break;
  console.log(i);
  i++;
}

However, in the case where you are not fully using all three expression positions — especially if you are not declaring variables with the first expression but mutating something in the upper scope — consider using a while loop instead, which makes the intention clearer.

let i = 0;

while (i <= 3) {
  console.log(i);
  i++;
}

Declaring a variable within the initialization block has important differences from declaring it in the upper scope, especially when creating a closure within the loop body. For example, for the code below:

for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
  setTimeout(() => {
    console.log(i);
  }, 1000);
}

It logs 0, 1, and 2, as expected. However, if the variable is defined in the upper scope:

let i = 0;
for (; i < 3; i++) {
  setTimeout(() => {
    console.log(i);
  }, 1000);
}

It logs 3, 3, and 3. The reason is that each setTimeout creates a new closure that closes over the i variable, but if the i is not scoped to the loop body, all closures will reference the same variable when they eventually get called — and due to the asynchronous nature of setTimeout, it will happen after the loop has already exited, causing the value of i in all queued callbacks' bodies to have the value of 3.

This also happens if you use a var statement as the initialization, because variables declared with var are only function-scoped, but not lexically scoped (i.e. they can't be scoped to the loop body).

for (var i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
  setTimeout(() => {
    console.log(i);
  }, 1000);
}
// Logs 3, 3, 3

The scoping effect of the initialization block can be understood as if the declaration happens within the loop body, but just happens to be accessible within the condition and afterthought parts. More precisely, let declarations are special-cased by for loops — if initialization is a let declaration, then every time, after the loop body is evaluated, the following happens:

1. A new lexical scope is created with new let-declared variables.
2. The binding values from the last iteration are used to re-initialize the new variables.
3. afterthought is evaluated in the new scope.

So re-assigning the new variables within afterthought does not affect the bindings from the previous iteration.

Creating closures allows you to get hold of a binding during any particular iteration. This explains why closures created within the initialization section do not get updated by re-assignments of i in the afterthought.

for (let i = 0, getI = () => i; i < 3; i++) {
  console.log(getI());
}
// Logs 0, 0, 0

This does not log "0, 1, 2", like what would happen if getI is declared in the loop body. This is because getI is not re-evaluated on each iteration — rather, the function is created once and closes over the i variable, which refers to the variable declared when the loop was first initialized. Subsequent updates to the value of i actually create new variables called i, which getI does not see. A way to fix this is to re-compute getI every time i updates:

for (let i = 0, getI = () => i; i < 3; i++, getI = () => i) {
  console.log(getI());
}
// Logs 0, 1, 2

In fact, you can capture the initial binding of the i variable and re-assign it later, and this updated value will not be visible to the loop body, which sees the next new binding of i.

for (
  let i = 0, getI = () => i, incrementI = () => i++;
  getI() < 3;
  incrementI()
) {
  console.log(i);
}
// Logs 0, 0, 0

This logs "0, 0, 0", because the i variable in each loop evaluation is actually a separate variable, but getI and incrementI both read and write the initial binding of i, not what was subsequently declared.

The following for cycle calculates the offset position of a node in the afterthought section, and therefore it does not require the use of a statement section, a semicolon is used instead.

function showOffsetPos(id) {
  let left = 0;
  let top = 0;
  for (
    let itNode = document.getElementById(id); // initialization
    itNode; // condition
    left += itNode.offsetLeft,
      top += itNode.offsetTop,
      itNode = itNode.offsetParent // afterthought
  ); // semicolon

  console.log(
    `Offset position of "${id}" element:
left: ${left}px;
top: ${top}px;`,
  );
}

showOffsetPos("content");

// Logs:
// Offset position of "content" element:
// left: 0px;
// top: 153px;

Note that the semicolon after the for statement is mandatory, because it stands as an empty statement. Otherwise, the for statement acquires the following console.log line as its statement section, which makes the log execute multiple times.

You can create two counters that are updated simultaneously in a for loop using the comma operator. Multiple let and var declarations can also be joined with commas.

const arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
for (let l = 0, r = arr.length - 1; l < r; l++, r--) {
  console.log(arr[l], arr[r]);
}
// 1 6
// 2 5
// 3 4

• empty statement
• break
• continue
• while
• do...while
• for...in
• for...of